Liberal Arts and Servile Arts

Christian and classical school often find themselves in a dilemma in regard to what they should offer by way of classes. A school must make a multitude of choices concerning curricular, co-curricular and extra-curricular offerings. Recovering a basic understanding of classical education as a liberal arts education will assist in helping schools with these decisions.

The pre-modern educational models made a clear distinction between the liberal arts and servile arts. The two models are different in regard to the goals that they pursued. The goal of the liberal arts was to cultivate a wise and virtuous man. The goal of the servile arts was to cultivate skills for a given trade (like blacksmithing). The liberal arts focused on producing the student that had the general skills that apply to all studies (such as thinking) and the servile arts focused on specific skills that only applied to one vocation. Today, our universities, colleges, and high schools have succumbed to the influence vocational and servile training.

C.S. Lewis contrasts liberal arts education with what he calls “vocational training,” – the educational model prepares one for employment. Such training, he writes, “aims at making not a good man but a good banker, a good electrician, . . . or a good surgeon.” Lewis does admit the importance of such training–for we cannot do without bankers and electricians and surgeons–but the danger, as he sees it, is the pursuit of training at the expense of education. “If education is beaten by training, civilization dies,” he writes, for “the lesson of history is that civilization is a rarity, attained with difficulty and easily lost.”

Many schools seek to add courses such as computer science to their curriculum. While I have no problem with students having a basic understanding of computers, especially in this day and age, schools must understand that they are providing a course that is not a liberal arts offering. Also, with a school’s limited time and resources, we must understand that such servile courses are taking the place of other core curricular liberal arts training in the schedule of each day. We should focus on providing a strong, quality liberal arts education first and then, if we have left over time and money (which we probably won’t), we can offer other “extra” curricular courses.

As Lewis reminds us, it is the liberal arts, not vocational training, that preserves civilization by producing wise and virtuous men.

Advertisements

4 Responses

  1. […] to be displaced by vocational training; when the liberal arts were pushed aside in favor of the servile arts; when the quest for wisdom and virtue was replaced by […]

  2. I have degrees in the “servile arts” (mechanical engineering and management sccience) and “liberal arts” (theology). The dichotomy of “liberal” and “servile” arts is a creation of the medieval, pre-scientific, Catholic world where monarchies and church dominated the masses through limiting education to the few. It is not informed by the Protestant, Reformed, or Democratic models at all. These new models of thinking, upon which America is founded, elevated all professions to the glory of God, and changed the world forever. The old distinctions had to be dismantled. The question about what the consequences of the domination of technology education are good ones. I don’t question the observation that there is a utilitarian disintegration of college education. But attempts to return to the medieval days are not the answer. Those of you who still use those old distinctions are unwittingly reinforing class distinctions between lawyers and engineers, philosophers and programmers. I recognize your motives might be noble. But God is not honored by such elitism. And it doesn’t work in reality. The tuition dollars going into your classical schools largely comes from technical professionals’ salaries. The better question is “How can the Classical Christian model inform and transform technology education?”, not hide from it.

  3. I agree. Most of what I know in terms of liberal arts was gained by reading for pleasure. I have a baccalaureate degree in a servile art (BS in Mining Engineering). While it helped me develop in to a tenacious SOB, it wasn’t a liberating education.

  4. And women?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: